How Quickly Do You Fall in Love?
Falling fast is a trait, and it has a name
Most people assume that how fast you fall depends on who you met. For some people it barely does. Psychologists gave this a name in 2011 - emophilia, the tendency to fall in love quickly and often - and found it behaves like a trait: consistent across partners, and distinct from insecurity. That last part is the surprise. Falling fast is usually read as neediness, and the research says it is closer to enthusiasm.
Before you start There are no right answers. Pick what is usually true for you, not what sounds best.
Answer about how you have been across your whole romantic history, not about the last person. The whole point of this one is the pattern that repeats.
What it measures
Three separate things that all look like falling hard. Speed is emophilia proper: how fast the feeling arrives and how often. Idealisation is what you believe about love before you meet anybody - one true person, love at first sight, the rest will sort itself out. Preoccupation is what happens once it starts: how much of your attention the other person takes.
Based on: Emophilia (Jones), romantic beliefs (Sprecher & Metts, 1989) and passionate love (Hatfield & Sprecher, 1986)
Possible results
Speed
How fast the feeling arrives, and how often.
Idealisation
What you believed about love before you met anyone.
Preoccupation
How much room they take up once it starts.
Common questions
Is falling in love fast a red flag?
Not in itself, and the research is unusually clear here: emophilia is distinct from anxious attachment, which is the thing people are usually thinking of when they call it a red flag. Falling fast out of enthusiasm and falling fast out of fear of being alone look identical from outside and behave differently. The genuine risk is narrower than the reputation: the feeling arriving before the information means the person is chosen on very little, so the fix is a rule about time rather than a rule about feelings.
Does the intensity always fade?
The preoccupied kind does, for almost everybody, usually within the first year or two. That is the constant checking, the difficulty concentrating, the whole-day-changed-by-one-message state. What the long-term research finds is that it is replaced rather than simply lost: in couples who stay happy, the urgency goes and a calmer, steadier attachment takes its place. The common and costly mistake is reading the end of the first thing as the absence of the second.
How is this different from the attachment test?
Attachment describes what you do once you are close to someone - how you handle needing them, and what you do when they are distant. This describes the entry: how fast you get there and what you believe on the way in. They are measurably separate, and the interesting combinations are the mismatched ones. Falling fast while being securely attached looks like a whirlwind that turns out fine. Falling slowly while being anxiously attached looks like someone who takes two years to commit and then cannot relax for a week.
Sources
- Sprecher, S., & Metts, S. (1989). Development of the Romantic Beliefs Scale and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
- Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence.
- Jones, D. N. (2015). Life outcomes and relationship dispositions: The unique role of emophilia. Personality and Individual Differences.
An honest note This is a short adaptation of three lines of research rather than any one validated scale, and the three bars do not have equal support behind them. Emophilia is the strongest of the three: it has been replicated across samples, it holds up as a trait, and it has been shown to be statistically distinct from anxious attachment, which matters because falling fast is so often assumed to be the same thing as insecurity. The romantic beliefs and passionate love measures are both well established but describe states and attitudes that genuinely change over a lifetime, so a result here is a snapshot rather than a fixed reading. None of this predicts whether a particular relationship will work. It describes how you tend to enter them.
Try one of these next
How Did Your Family Communicate?
The family you grew up in taught you rules about talking that you probably never noticed
What Is Your Flirting Style?
Five ways of signalling interest, and why some go unnoticed
How Forgiving Are You?
Forgiving others, forgiving yourself, and forgiving the things nobody did